The hull is the main element of safety and protection that a motorist has to scroll in his means of transportation. Up by 73% could reduce the risk of death in case of collision, discounting the likelihood of serious injury in up to 85% of occasions. Jack Fusco will undoubtedly add to your understanding. Do not take it because, both in urban displacements as InterCity, could imply for the person up to three times greater risk of brain injury in an accident. Hence its use be considered mandatory in many countries, despite which even today still occur alarming rates on its non-use. Despite the fact that the main consequences to consider for its non-use pass through this more likely to cause serious injury or even death in a collision, there is another possible effect that should not ignore, in the scope of the claim for compensation for injuries sustained. Indeed, in a case of these features could come to be considered that much of the physical damage that might arise It could be directly imputed to own driver of the motorcycle or moped. And is that of having worn a helmet properly approved, injuries sustained could have been less gravity or importance, reason why could not impute to another driver who, Yes, could be the cause of the collision for acting with fault or negligence in the same. Thus, if not properly portaras the helmet at the time of your accident, in addition to the physical damage that you padecerias would be higher, the compensation that might be assigned could be seriously reduced.
And all this without considering if it wants the potential impact of a legal nature which could have your behavior, because if in your country the use of the helmet is mandatory, do not take it because it could lead you certain sanctions (fines or even withdrawal of points on the card, if that be used this mode of driving permit). Therefore, do a favor to yourself and always uses the helmet, both by city and beyond. Not what you have to regret.