Month: January 2013

Color Promises

January 21, 2013

To remember whenever we receive what we speak. Former: I do not go to obtain to pay my accounts I do not obtain to save my marriage My wage valley nothing Does not know why we speak thus? Because in they lack to wisdom and revelation to them. Necessary that my eyes are opened. Everything what I hear, I can forget Everything what I feel I can forget But never I go to forget what I see. Everything is ready, this has that to be mine it speaks. Fp. 4:19.

My God, according to its wealth, will supply all your necessities in glory, for Christ Jesus. What we speak is what it represents in them. If I speak what it is in the word, then I enter in agreement with God and I announce who I I am. The word is expression of a person. Changing our word of defeat for the victory.

This is to believe in the promises of the Father, is if to possess of everything that already he was determined, is to enter in the history that God wrote pra each of one of us before he had world. To take the word and to become it alive in us, more as one not accumulated of letters or information, but alive, source of life, receiving and liberating life, overflowing. Rm. 4:21. being most certain of that what it had also promised was powerful to make it. II Color 1:20 Because all how many promises have of God, is in it yes, and for it Amen, for glory of God for us. II Foot 1:4 For which it in has given greatest and precious promises to them, so that for them you are participant of the divine nature, having escaped of the corruption, that for the concupiscncia has in the world. I Jo 2:25 and this is the promise that it made in them: the perpetual life.

The PROBLEM OF The LAW JOUST

January 2, 2013

This exactly country if moves away from its primary ideology, restoring a doubt on the effective operational system, what it is not very different of our reality, the Brazilian judiciary system, carries through walked its for the abyss. This way all delay the processes complete nothing more nothing less of what approximately ten years of judicial movement, for the presentation of a solution with regard to the presented demand. With this we are far from knowing the efficiency legal, and as sympathetical of the philosophy we must search an agreement on what it is really to be ‘ ‘ justo’ ‘ in all its directions, since the ability and attributions of the state that must co-ordinate and improve its judicial system. As well as later we must search the agreement on the true one felt of justice when carrying through the facts of ours relation human being always stops with the world having visualizing the natural balance of all the things, without proceeding with judgments and decisions insensatas.

Ahead of all the argument and possible questioning, let us make us it boarding on the PROBLEM OF the LAW JOUST. The RIGHT IN ITS PRECISE MEANING Initially, before if saying of the subject justice, must be boarded the right in its precise meaning, that is, to speak of justice without mentioning the right, is at least disproportionate of form that the right in its real direction is propeller of the meaning of justice, therefore the right uses in its totality the justice concept. To understand the note carried through, let us make the following example, in an independent society of its creed, social aspect or cultural, this society will be emanated by normative, moral regiments and social, let us say that in one definitive case, two people argue the determined right of property of one local one, this society by means of its jurisdictional agent, that is, the judge will have to bring has both the solution of the attrition demanded in process, at this moment appears the knowledge of its right, each involved agent in the conflict must know its rights and obligations.