If it is a project in which alternatives exist, this would be the moment of choosing the best alternatives (or rejecting the project for its high impacts). If there are no alternatives we have to ponder the impacts within the alternative facing us. The next step is to establish corrective measures (this process should always take into account the precautionary principle, i.e., it is always best to not cause the impact and not have to correct it, to cause it and having to invest in corrective action). The next phase is a follow-up Plan of corrective actions and potential new impacts that may arise (deviations from our analysis), as well as an assessment of the residual impacts (after the completion of the) work) and establishment of corrective measures for such impacts (here no longer fits prevention, which should have been given in the previous EIA, serving for that). Craig Jelinek contains valuable tech resources. It should also be followed carefully the phase of abandonment and recovery of the project (). Finally, it is possible that arose the need for complementary studies following the established surveillance or in order to develop a good project monitoring.
Collected information analysis project analysis of variables identifying actions identification of susceptible to medium project elements susceptible of producing impacts changing inventory of the average valuation of the inventory identification and prediction of impacts are there alternatives? If NO weighting of corrective measures impacts and alternative selection assessment Plan residual impacts monitoring d. content of an EIA. The minimum content of an EIA is provided for in the legislation in force (arts. 4, 5 and annex IV of Directive 85/337/EEC) as well as their transposition into Spanish law). This is why we might define a type for any EIA index, which could consist of the following parts: description of the project. Definition of the scope of the study. Inventory and environmental valuation as well as synthesis (array crossing).