Total two permits. Valerie Leave him apartment. So did my girlfriend when she left. He does not need small money, but the apartment and can bite. If you leave without the child, to his 18-year anniversary of you without the permission of her father not to take out.
After the court issue is resolved by money (Too big). Magpie If seen at least once a year – so do not deprive the rights of paternity. And do not pay child support – you agreed to this? So, too, for the court is not an argument. But read that there are cases where, for all the alimony and child, the court dealing with allow a child to go to 'place of residence of mother. " Still depends on how old the child, sometimes he may say to the court, and it will take into account, with whom the child wants to live. If you do not like the response of one lawyer – go around to a few. Mermaid As for the court – sometimes it is easier than to agree, and if the necessary factors are not so expensive. There was a case three years ago, no alimony, no education + witnesses who confirmed that the long-appearing and was not involved in the fate of child.
Problem was resolved for two court hearings, attorney's fees triggered correctly – If $ 300 JD's ex-husband does not want a better future for their child, the court only. Meeting once a year for a visual signal IMHO, if indeed interest in his son, would have seen more often in this court should pay attention, plus the lack of common sense in the reluctance to give permission to emigrate to Canada, and, consequently, larger and better prospects and a future for the child. Lack of maintenance is unlikely to be susceptible for a good lawyer will prove the fact of correspondence in your property by agreement of the parties. Source: Case